The Troubling Legacy of the UWP and Dominica's Airport Aspirations

The narrative surrounding the United Workers Party (UWP) and the long-awaited international airport in Dominica is not just one of political ambition; it is also steeped in contradictions and conflicts of interest. For years, the UWP has insisted on its exclusive right to build this vital infrastructure, yet their actions have often revealed a troubling agenda.

A History of Ambition and Obstruction

In 1998, while in power, Edison James was actively pursuing the acquisition of a quarry and equipment in the same or similar area designated for the airport. This quarry was intended to supply essential materials for the airport project that the UWP planned to undertake. However, this raises significant concerns about **insider trading** and a clear **conflict of interest**. How can a political leader advocate for a project while simultaneously positioning themselves to profit from associated ventures?

Fast forward to today, and we see a similar pattern. As the Labor Party moves forward with plans for the airport, backed by funding from the Citizenship by Investment (CBI) program, the UWP has resorted to legal maneuvers to block progress. They cite the absence of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as a reason to halt construction, yet their attempts to shut down a quarry essential for material sourcing seem hypocritical.

Desperate Measures Amid Bankruptcy

The UWP's current legal challenges appear less about genuine environmental concerns and more about political survival. With their organization facing bankruptcy of ideas and relalvance, these actions are seen as desperate attempts to remain relevant in a rapidly changing political landscape. Many believe that their legal claims will ultimately be dismissed in court, further highlighting their struggle to find footing.

Let's just wait another radiothon will be put together to be paid directly to Eddison, just as Lennox did.

A Call for Genuine Progress

As Dominica stands on the brink of significant development with the potential construction of its international airport, it is disheartening to witness a major political party engaging in tactics that threaten this opportunity. The airport represents not just infrastructure but hope for economic growth and job creation.

In these challenging times, it is crucial for all parties to prioritize national interests over political rivalry. The future of Dominica depends on collaboration rather than divisive tactics that hinder progress. Let us hope that reason prevails and that Dominica can finally realize its dream of an international airport—one that benefits all citizens, regardless of party affiliation.